Best Boomi Alternatives in 2026
Boomi is a solid mid-market iPaaS platform. But at $50K+/year, some companies want more power (MuleSoft), a modern UX (Workato), or a cheaper option (Celigo, Make). Here are the alternatives worth evaluating if Boomi isn't the right fit.
At a Glance
| Tool | Price | Best For | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MuleSoft | From ~$75K/year | Enterprise teams needing API-led connectivity and deep Salesforce integration | Full API lifecycle management with the largest integration talent pool |
| Workato | From ~$10K/year | Business-technology teams wanting a modern, recipe-based iPaaS | Recipe-based automation with a consumer-grade UX and IT-grade power |
| Celigo | From ~$24K/year | NetSuite-centric businesses needing pre-built integration templates | Purpose-built integration templates for ERP and e-commerce workflows |
| Make (Integromat) | $9-$29/mo (+ operations) | Small-to-mid teams wanting visual automation at a fraction of iPaaS pricing | Visual scenario builder with 1,000+ integrations at 90% less cost |
| n8n | Free (self-hosted) - $50/mo (Cloud) | Technical teams wanting open-source workflow automation | Open-source, self-hostable automation with code-level flexibility |
1. MuleSoft
Coverage & Capabilities
MuleSoft's Anypoint Platform is the most powerful iPaaS for API-centric architectures. The trade-off is cost (2-3x Boomi) and complexity (requires certified developers). 116 job postings vs Boomi's 51 shows stronger enterprise adoption.
The upgrade from Boomi when you need deeper API management, complex transformations, or Salesforce integration depth. Budget 2-3x what you're paying for Boomi.
2. Workato
Coverage & Capabilities
Workato positions itself between Zapier and MuleSoft. The recipe model is more intuitive than Boomi's visual mapper for business users, while the platform handles enterprise-grade integrations. Strong community with 500K+ pre-built recipes.
The best Boomi alternative for teams that want a modern interface without sacrificing integration power. Pricing is competitive and the recipe library accelerates deployment.
3. Celigo
Coverage & Capabilities
Celigo specializes in application-to-application integration with strong templates for NetSuite, Shopify, Salesforce, and Amazon. Less flexible than Boomi for custom integrations but faster to deploy for supported use cases.
Best if your integrations center around NetSuite or e-commerce platforms. The pre-built templates get you running in days, not weeks. Less versatile than Boomi for complex custom scenarios.
4. Make (Integromat)
Coverage & Capabilities
Make handles most integration scenarios that don't require enterprise governance or on-prem connectivity. The visual builder is more flexible than Zapier's and supports complex branching logic. Not a full iPaaS replacement but covers 80% of use cases for 10% of the cost.
Consider Make if your integrations don't require enterprise compliance, on-prem connectors, or complex API management. It handles standard SaaS-to-SaaS integration at a fraction of Boomi's cost.
5. n8n
Coverage & Capabilities
n8n is an open-source workflow automation tool that sits between Make and Boomi in capability. Self-hosting gives you full control and eliminates licensing costs. The developer-friendly approach means you can add custom code nodes alongside visual workflows.
The open-source alternative for teams with engineering resources. Self-hosting eliminates licensing costs entirely. Less polished than Boomi but more flexible and dramatically cheaper.
How We Chose These Alternatives
We evaluated alternatives based on integration capabilities, pricing, deployment flexibility, and job market demand from our analysis of 23,000+ job postings.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the cheapest Boomi alternative?
n8n is free to self-host. Make starts at $9/month. Both handle common integration scenarios at a fraction of Boomi's $50K+/year pricing. The trade-off: neither offers enterprise governance, on-prem connectivity, or B2B/EDI features that Boomi includes.
Is MuleSoft worth the upgrade from Boomi?
Only if you need API lifecycle management, complex multi-system architectures, or deep Salesforce integration. MuleSoft costs 2-3x more than Boomi including talent costs (MuleSoft developers command $150K-$180K). For straightforward integration needs, Boomi or Workato are more cost-effective.
Can I replace Boomi with Workato?
For most use cases, yes. Workato handles enterprise integrations, automation, and API management with a more modern interface. Migration involves recreating integration logic in Workato's recipe format. Most mid-complexity migrations take 4-8 weeks.