Lemlist vs Apollo (2026) Compared

Apollo does everything. Lemlist does cold email better. The question is whether you need a Swiss army knife or a scalpel.

The Short Version

THE SHORT VERSION

Lemlist is the better choice if cold email deliverability is your top priority and you already have a separate data provider. Apollo wins if you want prospecting data, email sequences, and a dialer in a single platform at a lower total cost. The risk with Lemlist is paying for it plus a data provider; with Apollo, it's slightly lower deliverability rates.

Starting Price
lemlist $39/user/mo
vs
Apollo.io $0 (Free tier)
Annual Cost (5 users)
lemlist $2,340-$5,940
vs
Apollo.io $0-$5,940
Job Postings
lemlist 2
vs
Apollo.io 37
Database Size
lemlist 450M+ (via providers)
vs
Apollo.io 275M+ contacts

Quick Comparison

Feature lemlist Apollo.io
Starting Price $39/user/mo Free (250 emails/day)
Pro/Growth Price $69/user/mo $49/user/mo
Enterprise Price $99/user/mo $119/user/mo
Contact Database No native database 275M+ built-in
Email Warmup Built-in (lemwarm) Not included
Deliverability Focus Core strength Adequate, not primary focus
Multichannel Email + LinkedIn + calls Email + dialer + LinkedIn
Personalization Dynamic images, videos, landing pages Text personalization, templates
Best For Cold email specialists All-in-one outbound teams
The Big Risk Need separate data provider Lower deliverability focus

Deep Dive: lemlist

What They're Selling

Lemlist positions itself as the cold outreach platform built for deliverability. The core pitch is multichannel sequences (email, LinkedIn, phone) with built-in email warmup (lemwarm) and personalization features like dynamic images and custom landing pages. They're betting that sending better emails matters more than having the biggest database.

What It Actually Costs

Starts at $39/user/mo for email outreach. Most teams land on the Multichannel Expert plan at $69/user/mo for LinkedIn steps and advanced conditions. The catch: Lemlist doesn't include contact data. You'll need a separate provider (Apollo, ZoomInfo, or similar) adding $0-$1,250+/mo depending on volume. Total cost for a 5-person SDR team with data: $4,000-$10,000/year.

What Users Say

Users consistently praise Lemlist's deliverability rates and the warmup feature. The personalization tools (custom images, video thumbnails) get positive mentions for reply rates. Common complaints: the UI can feel cluttered, reporting is basic compared to enterprise tools, and the lack of a built-in database means juggling multiple subscriptions.

Pros

  • Built-in email warmup (lemwarm) improves deliverability
  • Dynamic image and video personalization
  • Strong multichannel sequence builder
  • Custom landing pages for each prospect

Cons

  • No native contact database
  • Reporting is relatively basic
  • UI has a learning curve
  • Per-user pricing adds up for larger teams

Read the full lemlist review →

Deep Dive: Apollo.io

What They're Selling

Apollo is the all-in-one outbound platform: 275M+ contacts, email sequences, a built-in dialer, and LinkedIn integration in a single tool. The pitch is simple: stop paying for three tools when one does it all. The free tier (250 emails/day, limited data) lets teams try before committing.

What It Actually Costs

Free tier works for solo prospectors. Most growth teams use Basic ($49/user/mo) or Professional ($99/user/mo) for uncapped sequences and better data access. A 5-person SDR team: $2,940-$5,940/year. No separate data provider needed, which keeps total cost significantly lower than Lemlist + a data tool.

What Users Say

Apollo users love the value proposition: data + outreach in one place at a fraction of ZoomInfo's price. The contact database is strong for US mid-market and tech companies. Complaints center on data accuracy (80-85% for emails, lower for direct dials), occasional deliverability issues, and customer support response times.

Pros

  • Built-in database with 275M+ contacts
  • Free tier is genuinely useful
  • Sequences + dialer + data in one tool
  • Significantly cheaper total cost of ownership

Cons

  • Email deliverability isn't its core focus
  • No native email warmup tool
  • Data accuracy lower than premium providers
  • Support can be slow for non-enterprise plans

Read the full Apollo.io review →

Which Should You Pick?

IF Cold email is your primary outbound channel
THEN Lemlist. The warmup, deliverability tools, and personalization features will get you better reply rates.
IF You need a contact database and outreach tool
THEN Apollo. Having data + sequences in one platform at $49/user/mo beats paying for two tools.
IF You send 500+ emails daily per rep
THEN Lemlist. High-volume senders benefit most from lemwarm and deliverability monitoring.
IF You're a startup watching every dollar
THEN Apollo. The free tier lets you start prospecting without any spend. Add paid when you've proven the channel works.
IF You want multichannel with LinkedIn automation
THEN Both handle this, but Lemlist's LinkedIn steps are more sophisticated. Apollo's dialer is the better add for phone outreach.

The Honest Take

This comparison comes down to philosophy. Lemlist believes cold email is a craft: better personalization, warmer IPs, and smarter sequences produce better results. Apollo believes cold outreach is a numbers game: more data, more channels, more volume at lower cost. Both perspectives have merit. Teams that invest in email quality (personalized first lines, dynamic images, careful warmup) will get more from Lemlist. Teams that want to scale outbound fast without managing multiple vendors will prefer Apollo's consolidation play. The uncomfortable truth: most teams using either tool haven't optimized their copy, targeting, or timing. The tool matters less than the fundamentals.

Questions to Ask Before Buying

  1. Do you already have a contact data provider, or do you need one bundled in?
  2. What's your daily email volume per rep?
  3. How important is email deliverability monitoring to your workflow?
  4. Do you need a built-in dialer, or is email + LinkedIn sufficient?
  5. What's your total budget for outbound tools (data + sequences + calling)?
  6. How technical is your team? Can they manage multiple integrations?
  7. Are you running multichannel sequences today, or starting with email only?
  8. What CRM are you using, and does it integrate with both tools?

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lemlist or Apollo better for cold email?

Lemlist is better for cold email specifically. It includes email warmup (lemwarm), deliverability tracking, and advanced personalization like dynamic images. Apollo is better as an all-in-one platform that includes cold email alongside contact data and a dialer.

Can you use Lemlist with Apollo's data?

Yes, many teams export contacts from Apollo and import them into Lemlist for outreach. This gives you Apollo's database with Lemlist's deliverability tools. The downside is managing two subscriptions and syncing data between platforms.

Which is cheaper, Lemlist or Apollo?

Apollo is cheaper on its own ($0-$49/user/mo with built-in data). Lemlist starts at $39/user/mo but requires a separate data provider, making total cost higher. For a 5-person team: Apollo runs $2,940-$5,940/year vs Lemlist + data at $4,000-$10,000/year.

About the Author

Rome Thorndike has spent over a decade working with B2B data and sales technology. He led sales at Datajoy, an analytics infrastructure company acquired by Databricks, sold Dynamics and Azure AI/ML at Microsoft, and covered the full Salesforce stack including Analytics, MuleSoft, and Machine Learning. He founded DataStackGuide to help RevOps teams cut through vendor noise using real adoption data.